One of the most frequent questions we get is about changing time of Open Task. So here is a step-by-step tutorial about the issue.
Step one – you need an open task. It doesn’t matter if it’s running or not.
Step two, click on the time (either running or stopped). This is what you should see. Click on the Stop the time link and let’s continue.
Step three. Enter the new time for the task. Easiest is to use 23 for 23 minutes, or 1,5 for 1:30 hours. You can enter time in many ways – more formats are described in the FAQ.
Final step – Press Enter or click anywhere on the screen to save the entry. That’s it!
August 17, 2007 at 3:08 pm |
Thanks for starting a “helpful hints” series – sometimes I’ve used some features for such a long time, that I didn’t even notice little new updates, or more efficient ways to enter my times…
Take Care,
Thorsten
August 20, 2007 at 1:37 pm |
[...] Completing tasks is the next big questionmark for many Toggl users after manual time entry, so this is what our next tutorial is about [...]
October 9, 2007 at 1:53 pm |
I would like to suggest a feature to enter time by specifying start and end time.
for instance : “12:15-13:00″ would mean 0.75h
October 18, 2007 at 4:32 pm |
Hi Per,
Thanks for your input in improving Toggl! :)
Best,
Kristel
January 3, 2008 at 5:40 am |
3rMxkc hi nice site thx http://peace.com
March 13, 2008 at 8:20 pm |
I have been needing something like Toggl, but I need this piece as well:
>>I would like to suggest a feature to enter time by specifying start and end time.
>>for instance : “12:15-13:00″ would mean 0.75h
I could manually enter the start hour, or it could (even better) run off my computer clock. That would be a great addition.
Thanks!
March 28, 2008 at 8:46 pm |
Hi,
I don’t have the “Task Completed” option. How can I activate that?
thanks!
April 30, 2008 at 4:47 am |
great hints
August 20, 2008 at 7:02 am |
I don’t have this “Task Completed” option… I’ve tried everything, but it looks like there’s just a simple list of tasks, and no way to make it be a detailed one where this function seems to live… argh